That's what causes the illegal access exception. The package is openurl. Class A is Servers; Class B is Server. The rule
<object-create-rule classname="openurl.Server" /> causes a class not found" exception. The rule <object-create-rule classname="openurl.Parser$Server" /> causes the illegal access exception that I mentioned in my original email. If I make the classes not static, I get an instantiation exception. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Cooper Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 10:29 PM To: Jakarta Commons Users List Subject: Re: [Digester] Can use inner classes? On 10/17/06, Allen,Eva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm attempting to write a small parser as part of another larger > application. I'd like to do something like the following: > > public class Parser { > > ... > ClassA s = new ClassA(); > Digester d; > d.push(s); > ... > d.parse(inputStream); > ... > } > class ClassA { > LinkedList ClassB; > public void addClassB(); > } > class ClassB { > String data1; > String data2; > String data3; > public getters and setters; > } > > I'm using an xmlrules file looks like > <digester-rules> > ... > <pattern value="resolver"> > <object-create-rule classname="ClassB" /> > <set-properties-rule /> > <set-next-rule methodname="addClassB" /> > > <pattern value="data1"> > <call-method-rule methodName="setData1" paramCount="0" > /> > </pattern> > ... > </pattern> > ... > </digester-rules> > > This all works fine as long as ClassA and ClassB are public classes. > But as soon as I try to make them inner classes of the Parser class > this fails with an IllegalAccessException (Cannot access a member of > class ClassB with modifiers ""). This should be fine as long as your inner classes are both public and static. -- Martin Cooper The Digester Developer Guide mentions something about this as a known > limitation and says to ask on the mailing list if I think I'm > experiencing the problem it mentions. So I'm asking. Is there a way > around this or am I forced to have public classes for use with the > digester? > > Since I originally wrote this I've found that I could use the > FactoryCreateRule to create an object that doesn't have a no-argument > constructor, but I haven't been able to find a proper ruleset that > will allow me to do this. Any suggestions? > -- > Eva Allen > Consulting Software Engineer, OCLC, Inc. > 6565 Frantz Rd., Dublin, OH 43017 > 614.764.6009 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Views contained herein are my own; they do not necessarily reflect > those of my employer > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
