Yeah, it wouldn't be terrible to add, but I think that current dev javadoc is a feature of the CI system and not of websites or documentation. So a mental note to look into adding javadoc generation to Phil's nightly build stuff.
Hen On 10/21/06, Andrew Serff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's pretty cool, except it doesn't have a current dev version of the java doc as well. Andrew Henri Yandell wrote: > On 10/19/06, Andrew Serff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> It looks like that only exists in the nightly builds. That is >> frustrating...can I rant for a second? >> >> Why is the javadoc on the main page pointing to non-released code? the >> javadoc should point to the currently released version. And it would >> also be nice if you guys (fileupload devs) could annotate your classes >> with when they were added to the API. Like "since 1.2." That way, this >> confusion wouldn't happen. > > Agreed. Here's my proposed solution: > > http://people.apache.org/~bayard/multidoc-jnr/ > > Just updated it with a bunch more versions. > > Hen > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
