Hello Rahul,
I think the following sketch is "extract content of state without
sequential substates":
The entry/exit action behavior and the name of the current (leave) state
should be identical.
The only observable difference if the additional state in the model and
as parent of a current state.
Again, I left out the datamodel part.
Did I overlook anything?
Regards
Wolfgang
---
before
<scxml initialstate="a">
<state id="a">
<onentry>
((b))
</onentry>
<transition event="c" target="a">
((c))
</transition>
<transition event="d" target="e">
((f))
</transition>
<onexit>
((h))
</onexit>
</state>
<state id="e">
<transition event="g" target="a"/>
</state>
</scxml>
==>
<scxml initialstate="a">
<state id="_new" src="external.scxml">
<state id="e">
<transition event="g" target="a"/>
</state>
</scxml>
+ external.scxml
<scxml initialstate="a">
<state id="a">
<onentry>
((b))
</onentry>
<transition event="c" target="a">
((c))
</transition>
<transition event="d" target="e">
((f))
</transition>
<onexit>
((h))
</onexit>
</state>
</scxml>
---
--
Wolfgang Frech
iteratec GmbH
Inselkammerstraße 4 D-82008 Unterhaching
+49-89-61 45 51-64 Fax: -10
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.iteratec.de
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
