--- Adrian Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry, > > I've just seen the Commons Convert project. Perhaps, > this question has already been asked (sorry), but I > can't access the archived mailing list link [1] > broken. > > The library named Dozer [2] is doing the same as > Commons Convert. > Why don't you join forces, or otherwise why do you > begin a new library for the same purpose (perhaps > it's > not the same and so perhaps I didn't understood) ? > > [1] > http://mail-archives.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > [2] http://dozer.sourceforge.net/
Yep, it's all pretty much the same aim. Currently however I am working on/with yet ANOTHER library, Morph, which is, with apologies to the Dozer guys (I am a defector from their camp since discovering Morph), much better-designed and has a pretty cool (larger) scope/feature set. And it's only getting better. I actually hadn't looked too deeply at commons-convert before, but now that I do I see that Matt Sgarlata is listed as a contributor. Matt S is the primary architect and project leader of Morph. >From my perspective, any resurrection of commons-convert should take the form of incubating the Morph codebase. :) -Matt ____________________________________________________________________________________ We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love (and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list. http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
