Hi, I see that it is looks easier to use a VFS instead of working directly with the FS because of the "uniform" API, but: What is the "performance overhead" of using this VFS implementation over the direct equivalent FS (for each type)?
I think, this would be very important to know, and it could be very important for the adoption of VFS. (Trying to propose to introduce VFS in one project, this was the first question I was asked :( ) Thank you, D. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-VFS--Performance-Overhead--tf3505231.html#a9789203 Sent from the Commons - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
