+1 Noah I will add that rather than discussing random topics uncoordinated, this discussion should be moved to rpd list. The sooner we reach concensus and adopt this soft landing policy, the sooner we can move forward / focus on ipv6 deployment. The status quo benefits no one in my opinion
Honest Ornella GANKPA 2016-10-14 11:20 GMT+01:00 Noah <n...@neo.co.tz>: > On 14 Oct 2016 09:17, "Andrew Alston" <andrew.als...@liquidtelecom.com> > wrote: > > > > Basically, individuals can apply to the access fund for projects that > need v4 space that will directly benefit the continent, they would have to > prove v6 deployment alongside it (not just plans to take a v6 block and > announce it, actual deployment plans, which would be monitored), and the > project would have to provide KPI’s etc etc. > > > > > > +1 Andrew and I totally agree with you. > > Similarly there is a policy whose text proposes the same narrative... > > http://afrinic.net/fr/community/policy-development/ > policy-proposals/1815-ipv4-soft-landing-bis > > I believe this covers pretty much what we are so far discusssing. > > Noah > > _______________________________________________ > Community-Discuss mailing list > Community-Discuss@afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ Community-Discuss mailing list Community-Discuss@afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
