John’s question was answered well before he asked it. Owen
> On Aug 22, 2021, at 10:28 , Marcus K. G. Adomey <mado...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Owen, > > You have not. Asking for petition before you provide the answer is your way > to answer specific questions? Be honest and provide the answers. Don't forget > to answer the question (Y/N) from John too. > > > > Marcus > > Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> > From: Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> > Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2021 5:20:52 PM > To: Marcus K. G. Adomey <mado...@hotmail.com> > Cc: Sylvain Baya <absc...@gmail.com>; General Discussions of AFRINIC > <community-discuss@afrinic.net>; Brian Sowers <b.sowers...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [Community-Discuss] FUNDRAISING & DONATIONS - TO KEEP AFRINIC > RUNNING > > I have answered all questions that have been asked. Your failure to read the > answers is not my > responsibility. > > Owen > > >> On Aug 22, 2021, at 10:19 , Marcus K. G. Adomey <mado...@hotmail.com >> <mailto:mado...@hotmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Owen, >> >> Stop your diversionary tactics and provide answers to questions asked you. >> >> >> Marcus >> >> >> >> >> >> Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> >> From: Owen DeLong via Community-Discuss <community-discuss@afrinic.net >> <mailto:community-discuss@afrinic.net>> >> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2021 5:06:20 PM >> To: Sylvain Baya <absc...@gmail.com <mailto:absc...@gmail.com>> >> Cc: General Discussions of AFRINIC <community-discuss@afrinic.net >> <mailto:community-discuss@afrinic.net>>; Brian Sowers <b.sowers...@gmail.com >> <mailto:b.sowers...@gmail.com>> >> Subject: Re: [Community-Discuss] FUNDRAISING & DONATIONS - TO KEEP AFRINIC >> RUNNING >> >> >> >>> On Aug 22, 2021, at 01:07 , Sylvain Baya <absc...@gmail.com >>> <mailto:absc...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Dear AfriNIC's Community, >>> >>> Please find my comments below, inline... >>> >>> Le ven. 20 août 2021 à 17:36, Owen DeLong via Community-Discuss >>> <community-discuss@afrinic.net <mailto:community-discuss@afrinic.net>> a >>> écrit : >>> I am confused… How is a question about consent an attempt to kill AFRINIC? >>> >>> >>> Hi Owen, >>> ...brother, thanks for you email. >>> >>> Please add the context; then you'll become less confused :'-( >> >> No, with the context, I still do not understand how a simple question >> constitutes an attempt >> to kill an RIR. Indeed, I find that it is people who are resistant to the >> idea of questioning an >> organization that are most likely to lead to said organizations demise or >> worse, its >> descent into corruption and malfeasance. >>> >>> >>> Is AFRINIC so fragile that it cannot withstand a simple question of its >>> consent >>> >>> >>> AfriNIC needs to be defended these hard times and it appears that some of >>> us >>> are doing very well *our* common duty (protecting our RIR against >>> 'predators') >>> as a *community*. (You should have been proud of them :'-() >>> >>> ...i found it admirable! and i wouldn't like to cross their way; while they >>> are >>> defending AfriNIC...not you? Feel free to continue to defend your champion, >>> though... >> >> >From my perspective I am attempting to defend AFRINIC and it’s member base >> and community from a staff and board which are determined to violate the >> rules as written. >> >> >>> >>> >>> and cooperation in a process initiated by third parties allegedly on its >>> behalf? >>> >>> >>> Question already answered here [1]! please let's know if it isn't enough >>> for you. >> >> I didn’t say that the question wasn’t adequately answered. I questioned the >> person >> who characterized the asking of the question as an attempt to kill the RIR >> for that >> act. >> >> >>> I would think not. If it is so fragile, then there are much bigger problems >>> than its financial state. >>> >>> >>> Owen, could you, please, elaborate a bit more on the above? >>> ...i can not wait to hear what you are predicting for the Future of AfriNIC >>> [6] >>> and of the RFC7020. Please, be examplarily transparent :'-( >>> Don't run away! >> >> Because of my current role, I cannot further comment on the ongoing legal >> battle at this time. >> >> I predict errata will be filed against RFC-7020 because it claims to >> document the current state >> of the RIR system at the time of writing and the statement that global >> providers universally deal >> with multiple RIRs has incorrect implications and is not entirely accurate. >> There are plenty of >> global networks that deal with a single RIR and even those that deal with >> multiple RIRs do >> not necessarily deal with the RIR for each and every region where they >> operate. >> >> There is widespread use of addresses from every RIR in other regions, >> including a lot of address >> space in use within Africa that is issued by ARIN, RIPE, and APNIC. >> >> Owen >> >
_______________________________________________ Community-Discuss mailing list Community-Discuss@afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
