On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 16:03, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > Costin Manolache wrote: > > Can someone summarize what's wrong with the gump descriptor used by > > all jakarta and xml projects ? > > > > I understand we may need to add more stuff ( maybe using some ns: ), > > but I don't quite understand why we need to change existing definitions. > > > If you look at the proposed DTD, apart from the root element, there is > basically nothing that the Gump descriptor cannot cope with. > It's the route we've taken with Forrest, and my proposal takes from that.
Sounds good. What about the root element :-) ? As long as it just add more info to the existing projects.xml files - I'm happy. The other question is if gump can ignore the extra info - but I assume it can, at least from the xsl that I understand so far. Costin
