At 17:29 09.11.2002 -0600, you wrote:
On Saturday, Nov 9, 2002, at 02:29 US/Central, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
The liberal ideas expressed by Stefano, Sam and to some extent Costin are very inspiring and definitely please a wider audience than Duncan's ideas defending the actions of a selfish pig as he puts hit. (No, I don't think that Duncan is a selfish pig and you shouldn't either.)
Actually, "arrogant pig". :)
My mistake. Independently of the misquote, I would like to apologize for being careless in associating your name with a reputedly unclean animal even if I "just" quoted (or misquoted) you. I assure you that it was not meant as a derogatory remark against your person. I hope that much was clear from my tone but I think it is important to emphasize that.
I am not being obsequious. It is easy for the reader to forget the context and take the text literally. I wouldn't want my name associated with certain animals regardless of the context.
-- James Duncan Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [life live];
-- Ceki
TCP implementations will follow a general principle of robustness: be conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept from others. -- Jon Postel, RFC 793
