From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Well, I didn't ask about Gump, Centipede or Ruper. I asked about Ant and > Maven. Start there. And as far as I'm concerned, if Build Project X sucks > (a logical antecedent for the sake of discussion), then an Ant/Maven PMC > could resolve that by correction/replacement as part of their on-going > development.
I thought the whole reason that Ant, Avalon, Cocoon, James et al moved top level (out of Jakarta) was to get rid of top level umbrella PMCs so that each project has its own PMC. This is all Maven is trying to do. Any kinds of integration/merging is an internal decision for the Ant and Maven communities isn't it? I see Ant/Maven integration as a totally separate issue from who makes up the PMC to look after the Maven project. I don't see why why we'd need another top level PMC looking after both Ant and Maven as they are separate projects afterall. James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
