> -----Original Message-----
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 17 December 2004 03:09
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [ANN] Avalon Closed
>
> Stephen McConnell wrote:
>
> > When you say "and the two container factions that chose not to
> > participate with everyone else" you are implying and active choice?
> > Do you believe that the Avalon community was presented with a
> > choice?
>
> Yes to both. And multiple of each over extended periods of time.
>
> > Secondly, do you believe that the Metro project was established on
> > the premise of "non-participation" or was "pastures that permit such
> > behavior" just an unfortunate turn of phrase?
>
> My reference was to the choice by the Metro project to go elsewhere,
> where the leaders can make decisions without needing to cater to
> competing or conflicting voices from an established community, rather
> than to keep Metro within the ASF, and within the bounds of our
> decision making processes.
Thank you for that clarification.
Concerning our decision making processes, I have a couple of
questions...
* What do you think is the role of a PMC in our decision
making process?
* Within our decision processes, what do you think is more
important - the community or the individual?
Stephen.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
