Perfect. Thanks. It's always very useful to be able to borrow best practices from other communities.
- eduard/o On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:30 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Eduardo, > > there is a list of committers (they have all submitted the ICLA) and > the page also contains the contributors (non-committers), > that signed the individual CLA: > http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html > > (search for "Persons with signed CLAs but are not committers") > > HTH, > Matthias > > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:12 AM, eduardo pelegri-llopart > <pele...@calterra.com> wrote: >> Hi Craig! >> >> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Craig L Russell >> <craig.russ...@oracle.com> wrote: >>> Hi Eduardo, >>> >>> Well, I remember you from Sun. ;-) >> >> :-) >> >>> I think the situation isn't well-understood. Once you sign the ICLA, your >>> contributions are covered. If you don't want future contributions to be >>> covered by the agreement, don't contribute any more. >> >>> If you have a test case for a bug you submit, and don't want the test case >>> to become part of your contribution, there's a tick box on the bug report >>> that says "this is not a contribution". >> >> Didn't know about that tick box; seems a good idea. >> >>> What is the situation that you need covered? >> >> I can think of two cases. One is an unintentional contribution. This >> seems covered by the ASF ICLA clause about "intentionally submitted", >> which is not present in Sun's SCA. The other is more of a "statement" >> where the individual might want to indicate that it no longer is >> supportive of the institution, but there are other ways to do that. >> >> BTW, is there a public list of everybody that has signed an ICLA/CCLA? >> Something like Sun's [4]. >> >> [4] http://sca.java.net/CA_signatories.htm >> >> For completeness, the current version of Oracle's CA is OCA 1.6 [5]. >> I believe it is the same as SCA 1.5, with s/Sun/Oracle/, but not 100% >> sure. It has several clauses not in the ICLA, including one specific >> to commercial entities indicates "Any contribution we make available >> under any license will also be made available under a suitable FSF >> (Free Software Foundation) or OSI (Open Source Initiative) approved >> license." - that, of course, would not apply to ASF. >> >> [5] http://oss.oracle.com/oca.pdf >> >> - eduard/o >> >>>> [1]http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt >>>> [2]http://oss.oracle.com/oca-1.3.pdf >>>> [3]http://oss.oracle.com/oca-1.4.pdf >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscr...@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: community-h...@apache.org
