Mike has it right, it's a trademark thing. But please kill this thread
here, it goes to ask or commmitters and for most this will be considered
noise. Correct list for further discussion is d...@community.apache.org

Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Dec 29, 2011 4:17 PM, "Mike Kienenberger" <mkien...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am not an official Apache member, but here's my take on it.
>
> The Extras project area is for projects related to Apache, but not in
> any way managed by the Apache Software Foundation.  Because of that,
> it may not use the Apache brand-name, trademarks, nor the "org.apache"
> namespace.
>
> Consider Apache Extras to be more of an unofficial fan site of Apache.
>
> If someone (in this case, you) wants to create something that directly
> interacts or is related to Apache OODT, this non-related site gives
> you a place to put it where other Apache OODT users are more likely to
> find it.   But how the project is managed is up to you, and the
> ownership of the project and its assets remains with you.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 8:49 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
> <chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> > Hey Guys,
> >
> > I was reading [1] and I noticed item 3.1 and 3.2 stating that projects
> at Extras shouldn't
> > use the org.apache namespace (e.g., if Java), and they shouldn't use the
> apache project
> > name in their extras name. I find this kind of odd.
> >
> > Here's my concrete situation. Over in Apache OODT ville, I've got 2
> plugins for our PushPull
> > system that pulls down remote file content from sites and downloads
> them. The 2 plugins
> > are Java plugins that integrate libraries that are LGPL licensed. I
> can't include these plugins
> > in Apache OODT as part of PushPull even though we use the plugins
> extensively on
> > projects where we deploy OODT and they are better FTP plugins than
> existing friendly (to ALv2)
> > licensed projects. So, given the choice of simply keeping the code
> housed in our internal
> > JPL SVN and being unable to more broadly share it, I decided to throw up
> a project on
> > Extras called oodt-pushpull-plugins, and throw the code up there. I
> however did this before
> > reading [1] and am now worried I'm in violation of 3.1 and 3.2 because I
> used org.apache.oodt.cas.pushpull
> > as the namespace for my java package and I used oodt all over my code
> (which I licensed
> > under ALv2 FWIW, here [2]). FWIW also, the only folks I would expect to
> work on
> > [2] would be OODT PMC members, myself so far, and Brian Foster who are
> folks
> > who work on PushPull.
> >
> > So I'm wondering what's up with 3.1 and 3.2. Isn't the use of similar
> project names precisely
> > what we want at Extras? And what's the harm in allowing projects to use
> org.apache.oodt
> > in their namespace over there? That won't confuse people IMHO, because
> I'm not to
> > publish to Maven Central (and wouldn't want to -- I'd want folks to
> download this library
> > independently and mvn install it locally, and instructed folks to do so
> on [3]) and because
> > we will make it clear with documentation on our Wiki (that I was just
> about to write but
> > will hold off on until I hear the result of this thread) that the code
> at oodt-pushpull-plugins
> > on Apache Extras is *not* Apache OODT.
> >
> > Comments back would be appreciated. Ross told me that ComDev is charged
> with
> > Apache Extras so that's why I'm asking here.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Chris
> >
> > [1] http://community.apache.org/apache-extras/guidelines.html
> > [2] http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/oodt-pushpull-plugins/
> > [3] http://s.apache.org/8FB
> >
> >
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> > Senior Computer Scientist
> > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> > Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
> > Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
> > WWW:   http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
> > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscr...@apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: community-h...@apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscr...@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: community-h...@apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to