On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Christian Ledermann
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Stefano Costa <[email protected]> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> Il 27/06/2012 18:25, Sean Gillies ha scritto:
>>> This would be a more general and less Shapely-dependent way to
>>> represent geometries, if you like.
>>
>> Especially considered that the library is otherwise pure Python, I
>> would second Sean's suggestion. I wonder if the "geojson" package fits
>> the purpose
>> I have nothing against Shapely of course, but its dependency on GEOS
>> makes it more complicated to install with modern Python packaging
>> tools like pip.
I just pushed v 0.2 to pypi which does not rely on shapely anymore (but will
happily use if it is installed)
--
Best Regards,
Christian Ledermann
Nairobi - Kenya
Mobile : +254 702978914
<*)))>{
If you save the living environment, the biodiversity that we have left,
you will also automatically save the physical environment, too. But If
you only save the physical environment, you will ultimately lose both.
1) Don’t drive species to extinction
2) Don’t destroy a habitat that species rely on.
3) Don’t change the climate in ways that will result in the above.
}<(((*>
_______________________________________________
Community mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gispython.org/mailman/listinfo/community
