ma, 2007-01-15 kello 16:49 -0700, Joe Pfeiffer kirjoitti: > Mike writes: > >Yes I know that, I still vote for subject tags and reply-list. > > I don't really care about subject tags, but would prefer reply-list.
I don't really care about subject tags (space-hogging and useless as they are in the presence of headers better suited for filtering), but let me chime in with a hearty "no" for reply-to munging, just to balance things out a bit. (I also note that the people for munging and subject tagging don't apparently particularly care about keeping the subject line and the discussion in sync, which sheds some light to why they don't see how crowding it out would inconvenience some people. Ah well.) There was already a good reference on why list software should _not_ touch Reply-to. I'd like to add Lars Wirzenius's take on the matter, largely overlapping as it is: http://liw.iki.fi/lists/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00146.html That's that from me on this matter, and I do hope a quick death for this metadiscussion. -- Mikko Rauhala - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - <URL:http://www.iki.fi/mjr/> Transhumanist - WTA member - <URL:http://www.transhumanism.org/> Singularitarian - SIAI supporter - <URL:http://www.singinst.org/> _______________________________________________ OpenMoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
