Dear Hank, On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 06:50:03AM -0400, hank williams wrote: > While I agree with your argument that no header is the standard for FOSS, > this is not the case for the reply to issue, which you did not address. As I > said earlier, the Apache groups (perhaps the largest FOSS umbrella) for > example, and many (most?) others do not have the default reply-to going to > the individual. Part of the reason for this is that it is bad user interface > for the default behavior to be one that is used perhaps 1% of the time. Most > people generally want to reply to group. Your default should be the most > commonly accessed option which is why your design decision on this matter is > not only not standard, but is, I believe, the minority design, even in the > FOSS community.
I'm not opposed to changing the reply-to for community, if you want that. In fact, I have now changed it. For all other lists I'm a bit less inclined to do it, but would be willing to change if there were many supporters of such a change. -- - Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://openmoko.org/ ============================================================================ Software for the world's first truly open Free Software mobile phone _______________________________________________ OpenMoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
