> Funny way to define the concept. I must disagree: if you "use the various > classes" > you write C++.
Fair enough. I have seen plenty of C code using C++ objects that I didn't think of as real C++ code. It felt more like Obj-C to me, but again, to each their own. > Subjectively (for me), it is unsuitable for use. > > I write code as a job (have been doing that for longer than I wish to > remember). C and Ruby are my current tools. I know from multiple > personal attempts that C++ goes severely against my mental engrams. My > ability to pay my bills depends on how smoothly and effectively these > engrams operate. I cannot allow them to get disrupted. > > My complaint is that it would be difficult for me to put my hands into > the default apps. They are C++, QT, and expectedly using enough of > those creepy C++-isms (possibly, even those yecchy templates or > whereabouts). I would be comfortable with tinkering with C>K main > apps. On the other hand, I would find C++&QT main apps closed boxes (I > perfectly know that I could very well write C/Ruby new code on the > OM). Fair enough. We all think in different ways so I can see what you're getting at. I personally don't find C++ all that bad to grok once I get into it a little, but if we were all like me the world would be a boring place. :) > I do not know how you received the idea that I was irritated. Emotion + Email = Misinterpretation My apologies if I misunderstood what you were getting at. Best wishes whatever your decision on the phone, I certainly don't make any money if you buy one. :) Just curious what you found so wrong about the change, and you kindly explained it to me. Thanks. :) _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community