PLONK Am Mo 28. Juli 2008 schrieb arne anka: > > using examples of obviously bad quoting to advocat TOFU seems strange > > those "examples of obviously bad quoting" are a great majority of mails. > it so happens that i am tired of scrolling down endless mails is imple > skip them totally ... > i've said it already, but you did obviously not care to read my reasoning > instead crusading for an abstract rule of social life. > > > to me. i don't know what is worse in this case. the dicease or (your) > > "cure". > > the whole discussion is rather pointless because > - the missionaries of bottom postings usually are not interested in > reality but in some kind of educating the public, that's at least my PLONK > experience (and the argumenta ad personam are proof of it). > - a lot of writers of this list do not read faqs or archives and thus are > not concerned by such debates. the only hope is common sense, not tofu vs > fotu. > > if you had read my mail you should have understood that my concern was > readability, not some abstract principle. > PLONK PLONK PLONK > > since i made my point long ago i will not answer any mail regarding this > topic. > it's nothing but noise without any use. > > _______________________________________________ > Openmoko community mailing list > community@lists.openmoko.org > http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community >
PLONK PLONK PLONK PLONK PLONK PLONK PLONK PLONK /jOERG
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
