On 9/19/08, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > Andy Green wrote: > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Somebody in the thread at some point said: > > > > |> No some larger cards break us right now, can you let me know your > exact > > |> card type and I will do a little shopping spree today to reproduce > this. > > |> ~ I think someone else mentioned Sandisk 8GB is going to make the same > > |> trouble. > > | Its named Amco. A 1GB card. So should we stick to 512MB? We can live > > | with that too :) > > > > Somehow it's the larger cards seem to have the trouble, something to do > > with being slower to wake up and give first bulk transfer than we can > > currently handle, if you stick to the Sandisk 512MB right now it doesn't > > seem to show this behaviour. > > > > I doubt I find this Amco thing here in UK so I will just buy a few 8MB > ones. > > > > > Just to know, how the SD is formatted? > It is a vfat and u-boot use fatload? I am using vfat for uImage and ext3 for rootfs. Currently, rootfs cant be loaded because kernel panics on vfs drivers (or something) but the kernel has started to boot when I renamed it to uImage.bin ;-) I am going to repartition it to see if it will work. Should I go for a smaller rootfs patition instead of 982MB? Maybe 500 or 512MB. > > Regards Michael > >
-- Shaz _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
