Marco Trevisan (Treviño) wrote: > Leonti Bielski wrote: >> But what about PIM stack? >> There is a project from GSOC, but it's either dead or just being >> developed really slow. What if some time OM is spending on ASU get to >> develop PIM stack for FSO? Or even make a 0.9 release of FSO even >> earlier as planned? > > This is what I'd like to write. But there's a think I'd like to remark > here too (I've already said on the devel list), imho we should move to a > PIM stack that is compatible with the Qtopia one not to break > compatibility and support for multi-boot also from an high level > application point of view. > That PIM stack is quite good and accessible with easy instruments > (practically all is done with a sqlite3 database, and the same can be > easily doable with new python stack too). > > Imho this should be a key point. It's quite obvious that a good PIM > stack is vital for a portable device. >
+1 to use the Qtopia sqlite3 database for the PIM (it may be a recommendation of the community) and develop one (or many) python stack outside of the "low-level" stack ( suspend/resume, GSM, GPRS, SMS, GPS, sounds, screen, accelerometers) _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community