Does anyone use PosixOVL on top of VFAT? I know of this because of slax On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Stefan Monnier <monn...@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote: >> Anyway, I'm also inclined for FAT, mostly for the simplicity (thus "less >> susceptibility to corruption") and universality of the fs. I'm just left > > I'd stay away from FAT: its simplicity makes it less susceptible to > software bugs, maybe, but still susceptible to corruption. > > The general recommendation is to go with ext3 (ext2 is more likely to > get corrupted on crash or power loss, and fsck is a pain in the rear). > The potential performance (and wearout) issue with the journal is > only theoretical. > > > Stefan > > > _______________________________________________ > Openmoko community mailing list > community@lists.openmoko.org > http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community >
_______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community