On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 08:05:03 +0200 "Risto H. Kurppa" <ri...@kurppa.fi> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Joel Newkirk <freerun...@newkirk.us> > wrote: > > On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 15:05:10 +0100 > > Thomas Zimmermann <zimmerm...@vdm-design.de> wrote: > > > >> Additionally there are a lot of Packages that don't contain a > >> control file with depencies and so on: > >> > >> Form the packages in debian format are these: > >> > >> 0_tshark_1.0.99+svnr26030_armv4t.ipk > >> 0_wireshark-common_1.0.99+svnr26030_armv4t.ipk > >> 1_wireshark_1.0.99+svnr26030_armv4t.ipk > > > >> > >> So if the authors of these packages can update them that would be > >> great. > > > > I contributed those three - sorry, I hadn't noticed they were in > > your list. Strange, I downloaded the files from opkg.org and they > > are significantly smaller than the originals I uploaded. They > > contain the beginnings of the correct data, specifically > > debian-binary and the start of data.tar.gz, but are truncated. The > > tshark package, eg, is supposed to be 106606 bytes, but the > > download from opkg.org is only 65536 bytes. In fact, all three are > > truncated to powers of two as well > > - multiples of 4096 bytes... > > > > I'll try resubmitting them yet again, though not until tomorrow. > > (I'm off to bed) Clearly the files are getting broken at some > > point in the process, I'll try to rule out upload. > > Thanks for uploading them again. > I hope uploading again helps but I have the feeling that it's > something else, or that the upload fails for some reason and it has > really nothing to do with your actions.. Let's see if the scripts get > fixed at some point. > > > r > I uploaded them again, then re-downloaded to be sure - as of right now, at least, they are correct and intact. Uploaded the same files, from the same desktop machine, with the same browser. :( j _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community