On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 10:46 +0200, Fox Mulder wrote: > William Kenworthy wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 21:07 +0300, Risto H. Kurppa wrote: > >> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <r...@1407.org> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Is Qi reliable enough already to migrate from u-boot? > >> Yes > >> > >> r > >> > > > > no, fails to boot occasionally, and because it doesnt print anything to > > screen you dont know until much later ... > > > > so not unless things have changed and it seems currently unmaintained. > > > > Be nice to be corrected as uboot seems essentially in the same boat, but > > at least its more reliable. > > I use QI for some months now and it never failed once to boot my neo. I > also changed the version of qi some times to a newer version but this > never changed the working state for me. :) > So think of QI as stable enough for daily use. > > Ciao, > Rainer >
ok, thats a few saying it works so I'll give it another try. But I really really dont like the way it doesnt inform the user whats happening. BillK _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community