> more complicated and lure people into using NAND whereas SD is the > future. > > In the GTA03 design, we would not have used NAND for anything but > storing Qi and read-only factory data. Likewise, for gta02-core, I > wouldn't consider using u-boot.
my experience is, that nand is far more reliable and robust than sd (which had recurring issues of data loss). thus i have the crucial data in nand (ie minimal necessary system -- /bin, /sbin, ...). additionally i lived under the impression that nand was faster. of course, both date from a few months ago, when i decided to to not run my entire system from sd any longer. with my holidays ahaed and thus some time to play around: - what reasons make you say, sd is the future? - what reasons, except the impossibility to replace the nand when it is worn out by to many write operations, led to the decision to use nand read-only? _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community