do you understand the weight involved with using c++? without very very careful management, c++ is rather hefty for embedded devices. granted, having 128M to work in is indeed far more tenable than smaller devices but it's still onerous.
C is much more lightweight and very functional. any benefits of c++ usually don't overcome the drawbacks for embedded devices. -d On 06/24/09 07:09, mobi phil wrote: > Hey!! Is this kind of phrase "i am not interested in c++. " driving > the linux phone development? I can never understand how is it possible > to have such a huge gap on the scale between C programmers and C++ > programmers? Why are C++ programmers dying out? Is it because some C > programmers never managed to get the point with C++ and those who did, > switched automatically to Java? I propose a C wrapper arround Qt, for > the C programmers, and everybody will still benefit, beleive me. QT is > a treasure, is a nice clean code! And it is fast! _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community