KaZeR wrote: > > Christian Rüb wrote: > > > > > > using svn r2517 $HOME/.navit/navit.xml is used by navit again, there > > seemed to be a bug in opk package as navit.xml in /usr/share/navit was > > empty, too. Also speed seems to be the same for menus etc. One more > > advantage of using [2]: deactivating "map follows vehicle" in menu now > > actually works and makes map searching usable even if GPS is on :) > > > > > > Well, as a general rule, i would say that using the most recent one > (especially with 200+ commits) is usually a good idea. There are indeed some > new bugs introduced from time to time, but usually commits are done to solve > bugs ;). And in the specific case of navit, usually when something breaks > it's fixed the day after (like this navit.xml path issue).
That's what I did before for a long while but then switched to SHR package and did not get updates from svn. Now I am back to "original" navit packages and I am aware this can happen with devel versions. I was just a bit unfortunate to get a buggy version in the first place. But I would still be interested to build navit in a clean way for my SHR (i.e. using libgps17), as I have set up a build env for other apps already. A bitbake recipe would be appreciated. It's really a great app and with a hand crafted OSD layout also very useful on my FR. _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community