Am Donnerstag, den 27.08.2009, 10:58 +0100 schrieb Rui Miguel Silva Seabra: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:52:13AM +0200, Patryk Benderz wrote: > > I use OM2009T5, with OWrt state files and few SHR libraries. Why OM2009? > > Simply because it is much more stable than SHR-U. Now someone will start > > yelling "...but it is called unstable...". Fine, but SHR means "STABLE > > hybrid release" in first place. So i ask, where is this stability? > > I hate to say this, but in circumstances you are having new full time > > job, it might be worth to abandon OM2009. What to do on SHR? Definitely > > take care of _real_ testing branch which would be more stable. This way, > > some day maybe we will have SHR release which finally will be totally > > stable. > > SHR-U from 2009/08/08 is more stable than Om2009t5 on my FreeRunner. I used > to have to reboot about once per day, but now days pass without a reboot > quite easily!
"Days pass without a reboot quite easily" with 2009T5 here, but SHR-U didn't even show the PIN entry screen twice... _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
