Gennady Kupava, Mar. 09, 2011, 22:48 +0300: > 1. qt stack has richer functionalily, better performance, and less bugs > than that FSO dbus/vala thing (don't throw rotten tomatoes to me plese) > 2. qt has it's own resource management, FSO - it's own, rewriting qt one > to FSO one is worthless effort
OK, I'd like to ask one question now. Is there a reasonable technical way to *control* qt-stack-managed Freerunner without GUI? This means sending SMS from CLI and all these small things. In other words, I'm interested in command-line interface instead of programming interface. I believe the latter is up and running, but is the former implemented? Frankly, I do not know what the answer is. And yes, in case it is like "You just invoke this function from this library with proper arguments", I think I'll go and write a simple CLI wrapper, for this is just what makes Unix-like systems so usable. But if the only correct implementation lives deep in the code of qt stack, then we'd better try and separate it. Generally speaking, I guess it's convenient and powerful interfaces, rather than compatibility with existing applications, that matter more just here. -- Dmitry Chistikov _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
