Gennady.Kupava <g...@bsdmn.com> wrote: > Nice that you care about licenses,
More precisely, I care about freedom. GPL's requirement of providing the source simply happens to coincide with an identical requirement in my personal belief system. > no violation because link to sources > is provided on wiki page OK, never mind, it looks like I have found the link to your git repo: I don't know why I missed it the first time, sorry about that. Also looking at the commit tree in your git repo seems to have indirectly answered my original question: please correct me if I missed something, but it looks like what you have is simply a few of your own commits on top of openmoko/stable, which is the "stable" branch from git.openmoko.org. Did I get that right? If so, it means the "good" branch in the git.openmoko.org tree is the one named "stable", right? When you had started your own branch and chose openmoko/stable as the baseline, did you evaluate the others? Does anyone know if they have any merits over the stable branch? > Sure you can stick to git.openmoko.org, but nobody maintain that git and > it has few unfixed bugs. I will most certainly look at your patches and I may indeed like them. But I want to establish my baseline first. MS _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community