Order of importance of subdomains of openmoko.org is not the key point. I take notice that we can rely on those partners you named, but still we must find someone to manage contents. I don't know much of the publishing system, but may have a closer look at it if you want (if PHP or CGI it could be ok).
Also, take good notice I'm coming in Berlin from 22 to 28 of May, and hope to see you there. I will have suggestions and pro-active routes to develop the Openmoko project. There is a document (soon to be translated in English) describing my intentions at : https://docs.google.com/open?id=0BwsNltshAe2hMzZOa1l0V3ozdFU It's Google doc, so if you want things to be discussed more privately, tell me. Regards, -- Guillaume Farny CCAS de Bagnolet Place Salvador Allende 93170 Bagnolet FRANCE 06.16.52.42.32 [email protected] ----- Mail original ----- De : Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller <[email protected]> À : List for Openmoko community discussion <[email protected]> Cc : Maximilian Bauer <[email protected]>; Michael 'Mickey' Lauer <[email protected]>; Paul Fertser <[email protected]>; Harald Welte <[email protected]>; Joachim Steiger <[email protected]>; Joerg Reisenweber <[email protected]> Envoyé le : Jeudi 17 mai 2012 13h49 Objet : Re: *.openmoko.org infrastructure Am 08.05.2012 um 21:55 schrieb Bob Ham: > On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 20:33 +0200, Harald Welte wrote: >> On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 07:20:36PM +0100, Bob Ham wrote: >>> On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 00:08 +0100, Bob Ham wrote: > >>>> I've spoken through IRC to some of the guys at the Open Source Lab at >>>> Oregon State University¹. This group hosts, for example, the Meego >>>> project, as well as helping host parts of the Apache, Debian, CentOS and >>>> Gentoo infrastructures, to name a few. >>>> >>> Harald, Maximilian and Joachim, as the present administrators what do >>> you think about this idea? >> >> I think it's an excellent idea. This seems like a good idea, given >> that there are people who are already taking care of hosting other >> projects and thus already do quite a bit of sysadmin. >> >> So just to be clear on this: From my point of view the problem is not >> to pay for some hosting/traffic every month. If anything else fails, >> I'd even pay that out of my own pocket. The main issue is to have >> somebody who will actually take care of updating the debian packages, >> run backups, make sure things run smoothly and do a dist-upgrade every >> couple of years. > > Indeed, that is the main issue. The way I see it, freeing the community > from the burden of administering infrastructure can only be a good > thing. I think one point hasn't been addressed much in this discussion so far. How important are all the *.openmoko.org services to us? So I suggest to everyone on this mailing list to give an indication like this: I regard as important: ( ) lists.openmoko.org (incl. the mailing lists) ( ) wiki.openmoko.org ( ) docs.openmoko.org ( ) svn.openmoko.org ( ) people.openmoko.org ( ) projects.openmoko.org ( ) Others: __________________ This may shed a new light on this topic. Nikolaus PS: looking the mailing lists I have seen only three with major activity: 1. this list (community) 2. devel (which is more or less a dfu-util discussion list) 3. openmoko-kernel _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
