On Thursday, January 17, 2013 12:49:04, Radek Polak wrote: > On Thursday, January 17, 2013 01:52:57 AM Neil Jerram wrote: > > > (In general, for some reason, it appears that the floating point code > > in Pulseaudio and its dependencies doesn't run any better on armhf > > than it does on armel.) > > Hi Neil, > do you have also armhf compiled kernel? I had armel kernel + armhf rootfs and > it was even slower then pure armel.
Ah, interesting. After I managed to build QtMoko for armhf, I installed it in the experimental wheezy/armhf rootfs that you released a few months ago. So it depends what the kernel in that rootfs was. > Btw i am using armhf for a few weeks now > and i think i could make a release - just few apps are missing. Nice! I am looking forward to that. Neil _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community