Yeah, I would say they are up to no good.

http://www.senderbase.org/lookup/org?search_string=NetWork%20Operations%20Ce
nter

Joe



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 1:37 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [MBF]Re: Spam Flurry ?

Dave,

We see a number of new spammer nets every day, not always /24.  This is just
one of many.  I would recommend checking Senderbase before blocking.

Darin.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Beckstrom
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 4:22 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [MBF]Re: Spam Flurry ?

Here is another spam pattern:

66.96.244.13
66.96.244.22
66.96.244.41
66.96.244.49

So you can block 66.96.244.0/24




#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list <[email protected]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[email protected]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
<[email protected]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[email protected]>
Send administrative queries to  <[email protected]>


#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list <[email protected]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[email protected]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
<[email protected]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[email protected]>
Send administrative queries to  <[email protected]>



#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list <[email protected]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[email protected]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[email protected]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[email protected]>
Send administrative queries to  <[email protected]>

Reply via email to