> As for INVURIBL it does not seem to be supported anymore so we > would not spend any time integrating into Declude.
It still works Declude right now, I just meant the functionality: harvesting URLs out of the message content and then bouncing them off URIBL lists. (I think that's how INVURIBL works, no?) That looks like something that could be in Declude's wheelhouse, yes? Feel free to tap me around if I'm clueless. > I would not say that INVURIBL is redundant, however > Message Sniffer is a far superior product to INVURIBL. Love Message Sniffer. I'm a happy customer. But if INVURIBL is a waste of time because of Message Sniffer, I'd love to know so I can drag it all into an archive folder or something and never use it again. If it *isn't* duplicated by Message Sniffer, I'd also love to know so I can fine tune it again. I've ignored it for a long time, but back in the day it was one of my most effective tests. - Michael Cummins ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <[email protected]>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[email protected]> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[email protected]> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[email protected]> Send administrative queries to <[email protected]>
