Tina, I recognize the naming convention of that spammer. He uses fresh domains, 
obeys best practices for matching HELO+MAILFROM+REVDNS and uses clean IP 
addresses.

The explanation for what you are seeing is timing: the spammer isn’t listed at 
the time your server accepts the message. By the time the user reports the 
message as spam, and you check it, the domain and sending IP have been 
blocklisted.


Andrew.


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Tina Cline
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 7:15 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [MBF] FW: [MBF] Re: Emails should be failing URIBL




Pretty much – emails such as this that not only the links in the email but the 
sender domain is on the uribl-black and declude logs show there is no check/ or 
did not get flagged  (There is no mention of it “passing” but rather no mention 
of it failing either):
Link in email:  http:  //gohere. crestinternethosting71. link
from address of email: New Deadline Updates <NewDeadlineUpdates@ 
crestinternethosting71. link>
(I removed the hyperlinks and separated the address for security)

----------------------------------------------------------
Tina Cline
270net Technologies
Phone: 301.663.6000 x200
Fax: 301.663.4410
www.270net.com
"Internet Technology for Business and Government"
-----------------------------------------------------------

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Barker
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 4:07 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [MBF] Re: Emails should be failing URIBL

The RHSBL checks the senders domain is this what you are saying is passing  ?
On 10/23/2014 1:29 PM, Tina Cline wrote:
#http://www.uribl.com/ (PUBLIC) MBF REVIEWED 6/19/2013
URIBL-WHITE                     RHSBL   white.uribl.com                         
       127.0.0.2              -2            0
URIBL-BLACK                     RHSBL   black.uribl.com                         
        127.0.0.2              20           0
URIBL-GREY                        RHSBL   grey.uribl.com                        
           127.0.0.4              5              0
#URIBL-RED                        RHSBL   red.uribl.com                         
            127.0.0.8              0              0
----------------------------------------------------------
Tina Cline
270net Technologies
Phone: 301.663.6000 x200
Fax: 301.663.4410
www.270net.com
"Internet Technology for Business and Government"
-----------------------------------------------------------

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Barker
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 12:51 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [MBF] Re: Emails should be failing URIBL

How have you configured your URIBL?
On 10/23/2014 11:02 AM, Tina Cline wrote:
We are seeing a great deal of emails that should be failing URIBL-Black.  They 
come through and I verify they are listed in URIBL Blacklist, and the Declude 
log is marking them as passing the test..
I even changed Declude DNS to use a local host rather than public just in case 
URIBL was blocking the inquiries from public DNS.

Any ideas?

-----------------------------------------------------------
Tina Cline
270net Technologies – IT Support Specialist
Phone: 301.663.6000 x200
Fax: 301.663.4410
www.270net.com
"Internet Technology for Business and Government"
-----------------------------------------------------------



--

David Barker

Mail’s Best Friend

Email     : 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

Web      :  www.mailsbestfriend.com<http://www.mailsbestfriend.com>

Office    :  866.919.2075

Mobile  :  978.518.6461


--

David Barker

Mail’s Best Friend

Email     : 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

Web      :  www.mailsbestfriend.com<http://www.mailsbestfriend.com>

Office    :  866.919.2075

Mobile  :  978.518.6461

This message (and any associated files) may contain confidential, proprietary 
and/or privileged material and access to these materials by anyone other than 
the intended recipient is unauthorized. Unauthorized recipients are required to 
maintain confidentiality. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other 
use of these materials by persons or entities other than the intended recipient 
is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this message in error, 
please notify us immediately and destroy the original.

Ce message et tout document qui y est éventuellement joint peuvent contenir de 
l’information confidentielle ou exclusive. L’accès à cette information par 
quiconque autre que le destinataire désigné en est donc interdit. Les personnes 
ou les entités non autorisées doivent respecter la confidentialité de cette 
information. La lecture, la retransmission, la communication ou toute autre 
utilisation de cette information par une personne ou une entité non autorisée 
est strictement interdite. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur, veuillez 
nous en aviser immédiatement et le détruire.

Reply via email to