Hi David,
I am currently involved in an effort to develop an OSLC integration with a third party tool to DOORS 9.3 (the first OSLC compliant version). We have made some progress but have hit a wall with finding guidance on the core functionality of accessing specific DOORS data. Thus, my suggestion for the website is to place a full example of implementing the protocol in the context of a third part tool, initially for RM, but eventually for all of the core disciplines. By the way, any guidance you could provide to help us overcome the barrier we are facing would be most appreciated. Thanks, Bob Parro VP Business Development River North Solutions, Inc. - "Guiding the flow of change" www.rivernorthsolutions.com<http://www.rivernorthsolutions.com/> Office 815.877.6670 Mobile 815.540.9030 -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 11:00 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Community Digest, Vol 26, Issue 3 Send Community mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/community_open-services.net or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected] You can reach the person managing the list at [email protected] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Community digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Ideas for improving Open-Services.net website (Dave) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 16:54:25 -0400 From: Dave <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected], [email protected] Subject: [oslc] Ideas for improving Open-Services.net website Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Some of my colleagues at IBM have been discussing some ideas for improving the OSLC community website at open-services.net. They've identified some problems with the current website that could be limiting the adoption and thus, the success of OSLC. They suggest that content on the main pages of our site is not engaging, too static and geared solely to the needs of specification writers, who are important but perhaps not as important to OSLC as tool developers, end-using developers and decision makers. My colleagues have time/resources to devote to website work, and good ideas for improvements and new features, but since OSLC is a community effort, the OSLC community mailing lists are the place to discuss changes to the website and the right place to coordinate those who wish to work on improving the website. So, to start the conversation here are some initial ideas for improving the open-services.net website: * Create a simpler user experience * Provide more videos and links to other OSLC activities * Provide some business content on how useful OSLC is for integration * Links to other community initiatives * Developing a work item tracking model and flow * Encourage community contribution of their achievements with OSLC * Video?s * Tech-notes etc. * Capability to subscribe to certain events * Mouthpiece to drive community to build certain integrations, e.g. OSLC ?Hackathon? etc. Do you have ideas on how to improve the OSLC web presence, or feedback on the above ideas? Do you have some time to devote to helping to develop a better web site for the OSLC community. If so, please respond here and let's get the conversation started. Thanks, Dave -- David M. Johnson OSLC Core Workgroup Lead IBM Rational Software ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Community mailing list [email protected] http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/community_open-services.net End of Community Digest, Vol 26, Issue 3 ****************************************
