On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Steve K Speicher <[email protected]> wrote: >> From: Dave <[email protected]> >> Date: 06/27/2011 10:03 AM >> Subject: [oslc] Ways to think about OSLC SDK "reference implementations" >> > SNIP > >> Personally, I think we want #1 and #3 above. > > Sounds right. Would this imply that #3 would be used to build #1?
I think so. Although it might happen the other way around, we start with #1 (which is RIO) an re-factor it so that is is pluggable and becomes #3. - Dave
