"Res" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Mon, 3 Nov 2008, Faehl, Chris wrote: > ... > DKIM is like SenderID in that they are both seriously problematic with > mailing lists, where as SPF is not, which is one reason why I wont be > doing any DKIM testing on our MTA's, its the reason I dumped SenderID > checking, now everyones happy :)
Why is domainkeys problematic with mailing lists? Any mailing list should validate the poster and when redistributing, regenerate (or remove) the signature. There is no problem. Remember that the signature is to cover deliver TO the list and not beyond.
