At 01:50 PM 4/14/2002 -0700, you wrote: >Ouch! Put a 575 next to a CC/575 and tell me the 575 sucks. The 575 is >still able to use the video slot where the CC/575 cannot. The 575 has its >CD-ROM where the CC/575 does not (and it can be upgraded too). The 575 has >a screen you can see and multiscan too where the CC/575 has but one >resolution. Yet many of us including me are busily trashing perfectly good >(or able to be made good) 575s to get that MoBo so we can make our cute >"Mystics". I do believe Mike has raised a good question. I do believe that >our -p's answer is wanting. Is there no one to defend the very best of the >68k all-in-ones from going down to needless destruction? > >Bill
The 575 may well be the one exception. In general, the 5200/5300 models do suck (I've tried to use 27 of the 5300s at two schools. They're... hmm... It is true that the 575s do take up a lot of space. If someone is going to be tossing it out anyway I'd just as soon save the mobo. Unfortunately, 575s may be great Macs but they're still often not worth the cost of shipping to send them to someone who wants one. Scott Holder -- Compact Macs is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and... SPECIAL LIST PRICES - Replacement Apple CDROMs from $19.99, MacOS 8.5 CD $79.99 PPC 5400/200Mhz 16/1.6GB/CD/ENET/L2 $119, 5+ for $99 <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> Compact Macs list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/compact.shtml> The FAQ: <http://macfaq.org/> Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive:<http://www.mail-archive.com/compact.macs%40mail.maclaunch.com/> Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com
