Rahul - I have no objections to this. I was planning on doing an update to the squid 2 that is already on the companion over the holidays. I presume that getting the OK to add squid 3 might not be a big deal, but I will let the "approval experts" answer that.
Steve C. rahul wrote: > Hi, > I would like to know the list's opinion on this, > The squid web-proxy server has recently released the first version of 3.0 > Squid to 3.0 STABLE1 > Given that it is STABLE*1*, I think it is not ready for sfwnv-webstack > (we already carry 2.6 STABLE17 in webstack, and the users of 2.6 would > want 2.6 line to be carried forward too as it is not completely compatible.) > But it would be nice to make the squid 3.0 package available in Solaris as it > is a complete rewrite of squid. Given these, I would like to update the > companion-cd > squid package to 3.0 > > Do let me know if you think this is ok for companion-cd. > > rahul > -- > This messages posted from opensolaris.org > _______________________________________________ > companion-discuss mailing list > companion-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/companion-discuss >
