lianep at eng.sun.com wrote: >"Jeremy Teo" writes: > > >>Hello Liane, >> >>IMHO, there are no obvious issues with your points. The key difficulty >>up to now is getting everyone to agree on a central repository. >> >>The problem is social, not technical. If we could just all agree, and >>get something rolling, that would be ideal. :) >> >> > >There are some fun technical challenges involved in implementing the >requirements I suggested. But I do think that the first hurdle is >getting some agreement around a set of requirements which would allow us >collectively to build a useful central repository. If we can agree, I'm >confident there's enough interest and talent around this topic to get the >technical implementation rolling. > >thanks, >liane > >
This provides a great spring-board -- thanks Liane! My initial thought is that not all the items seem to fall in the cateogory of common source repository requirements; some seem to be build-system requirements. (On the other hand, the problem could be that my notion of what a source repository is is way too narrow...) Eric
