Yes, but it wasn't clear to me from the previous document what would
happen with existing GNU utils in /usr/bin, prefixed with the g, it
mostly spoke of no new g-prefixed utils.
From what I understood, these were going to be left where they are, and
named as they are - I didn't see any specific mention of duplicating
these same programs in /usr/gnu without the prefix, which is the point
I'm making.
e.g.
/usr/bin/gzcat should be hard linked to /usr/gnu/bin/zcat
Thanks,
Darren.
James Carlson wrote:
> Darren Kenny writes:
>
>> In the case of existing g-prefixed utils, I think it would make sense to
>> have the "non-prefixed" version in /usr/gnu.
>>
>
> Not just "make sense." That's actually the entire _point_ of having
> /usr/gnu.
>
>
