Alan DuBoff wrote: >On Tuesday 16 May 2006 01:55 pm, Eric Boutilier wrote: > > >>Yeah, in my opinion it should be easy to conceive a set of packages that >>even eschews Firefox in favor of something more efficent (which is to >>say, less complex to maintain, as well as smaller/faster), like Dillo >>(dillo.org) for example. >> >> > >Well, that's going to the extreme, no? ... >
I'd say that depends. In the context of this thread (a how-to document for coming up with package-sets for desktop/server "appliance" implementations) that question is up to the implementor. Eric
