>From dduvall at zruty.sfbay.sun.com Fri Dec 22 13:03:36 2006
>Thing is, protocmp doesn't understand the syntax for setting a package
>parameter. I haven't looked yet, but it shouldn't be terribly difficult to
>add this functionality. Mike (and others), do you think this would be
>useful, or would it simply enable functionality we don't really want to
>encourage?
protocmp has only come to understand prototype syntax as we
have needed it. I have no problems with it understanding
more (or even all). Whether it should be encouraged I don't know,
offhand it doesn't seem wrong :)
Mike
