On 7/28/07, Kristian Lyngstøl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/28/07, Erkin Bahceci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This patch adds appropriate limits (1-100) to opacity_values in core > > options. Minimum is 1 to be consistent with the opacity changing > > action and because it doesn't make sense to have an invisible window > > that is still there. > > The use cases may not be many, but you could say that for 1% opacity > too. I don't think it should be up to us to say that there aren't any > use cases when there's no technical reason not to allow it. > > Maybe change the opacity changing action to 0 too? Temporarily making > a window invisible doesn't sound too unreasonable.
You can make it 5 percent if 1 is too low. 0 is not a good idea because if a user sets 0 as opacity value (probably unintentionally), there will be invisible windows around that will prevent interaction with windows behind them, which will clearly look like a bug. Why would you want an invisible window that blocks interaction with the windows behind it? Anyway, the point of the patch was to have some limits rather than none. - Erkin _______________________________________________ compiz mailing list compiz@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz