On 4/10/07, Mike Dransfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Removing WRAP/UNWRAP totally seems virtually impossible > without losing a lot of functionality. If I make them just provide > a named method then I have to check each plugins attributes > one by one and they would still have to call unwrap/call/wrap > themselves during the wrapped function. Notice how inactive > calls the core method at a specific point, that would be hard > to do without the wrap function. > > If anyone has any ideas on making wrap/unwrap less > complicated without removing the functionality then I would > like to hear about it :)
In this case I see no reason why you couldn't UNWRAP immediately and WRAP at the end of the method so having the C side do it for you would still work. Anyway, the wrap/unwrap methods could still be available for special cases but I can't think of a time when automatically doing it at the start and end of a method would ever limit you. -- Travis Watkins http://www.realistanew.com _______________________________________________ compiz mailing list compiz@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz
