Kristian Lyngstol wrote: > > That's it so far. I really hope someone can rip this apart, since I ended > up trashing my more detailed ideas and threw this together in a hurry. At > least it should get the discussion started. > > Specially since this is written with C, and not C++ in mind. >
Hi, I joined the list because I saw that there's a compiz+boost+cmake project in the works (very cool). I'm a boost committer and I'm good with cmake. IMHO this is by far the best Coding Standard for C++: http://www.gotw.ca/publications/c++cs.htm A great, great book. Sutter and Alexandrescu have already done all the hard work. Each of the hundred items in the book is about 2 pages long, which is great for code reviews: you can just tag suspect code with comments that mention C++CS numbers, which makes things very efficient, and very educational for the reviewee if they are intermediate-level C++ coder. Can't say enough good things. -t _______________________________________________ compiz mailing list compiz@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz