2009/5/15 Derick Rethans <d...@ez.no> > On Sat, 9 May 2009, Hans-Christian Otto wrote:> to transform an action like > foo_bar to a method name like "doFooBar". > > Wouldn't "dofoobar" be enough? > > > > Using > > > > $actionMethod = 'do' . preg_replace( '@[^A-Za-z]@', '', $action ); > > > > should result in the same method. > > > > So, why do you still use camelcase here? > > You're right that the code would work fine. However, if we use camel > case, the method names also show up nicely in error message and stack > traces, making debugging easier.
Wouldn't it be better to make this optional ? -- Bertrand
-- Components mailing list Components@lists.ez.no http://lists.ez.no/mailman/listinfo/components
