Björn Dieding wrote:
> Why was there the need to rename them?
> 
> Best regards,
> Björn Dieding


easyComponents could have been an alternative close yet distinct ;)

While I understand why this can be a good decision from the project's 
perspective (the ASF thing, not the name ;)) and I think it's great that 
eZ Systems were open for it, I can't see why eZ didn't want to keep it 
inside and try to give it some more life internally...

Cheers,
Piotrek

-- 
Components mailing list
Components@lists.ez.no
http://lists.ez.no/mailman/listinfo/components

Reply via email to