Original Sender : DasaMan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------




Forwarded by DasaMan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------- Original message follows ----------------
 From: "Fred Langa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 To: "The LangaList" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Date: Tue, 09 Nov 1999 00:20:32 -0500
 Subject: [langalist] 9-Nov-99 LangaList
--

Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Address Change info is at the end of this note. 
Mailing List Trouble? See http://www.langa.com/help.txt 
Questions about the advertisers? See the end of this note. Please also see the legal 
info at the end of this note.

An easier-to read, formatted, HTML version is available for online reading at 
http://www.langa.com/whats_new.htm
(The HTML version of each issue normally is available by 9AM EST [GMT-5] on the issue 
date.)

LangaList advertising rates and info available at
http://www.langa.com/rate_card.html

Please email the LangaList to a friend!
(Use the super-fast form at http://www.langa.com/recommend.htm !)


                            The LangaList
                              9-Nov-99
                                  
     A Free Email Newsletter from Fred Langa About BrowserTune,
       HotSpots, Columns, Tips & Tricks, and Other Activities

                           In This Issue:
         Firestorm about "Microsoft's Loss Is NOT Your Gain"
                    "Why Microsoft Won't Settle"
                      Reader Tip On Taming AOL
                     Just Seven Weeks to Y2K...
                Final (ha!) Note On Registry Backups
                         Don't Make Me Beg!
                          Locked Out Again
                           Just For Grins
                                More!
                                  

Firestorm about "Microsoft's Loss Is NOT Your Gain"

In yesterday's Special Issue, I wrote that some of the DOJ's
antitrust "findings of fact" against Microsoft were deeply flawed. So
far, the early discussions are generating many excellent comments
supporting both sides to the issue.

Here's just a sample of the range of comments from strongly anti-
Microsoft, through a middle ground, to quite pro-Microsoft:

     How much do you think we would all be paying for IE were it
     not for those goodly folks at Netscape? My guess is about
     as much as we now pay for Windows. MS is guilty of gross
     profiteering as well as running a de facto monopoly. ---
     Anonymous

[Of course, the "goodly folks at Netscape" charged $50 per browser
copy. They didn't charge for betas, so many people got the FALSE
impression that the browser was free: It was not. Lots of consumers
ripped off Netscape long before Microsoft got Netscape in its
crosshairs by using the software without paying. But make no mistake:
Until Microsoft made browsers free, Netscape--- with its then 90%
share of the browser market---wanted $50 from you to use their
browser.---Fred]

     MS crushed NS with nuclear weapons - no company could
     sustain that type of onslaught. Any vestige of good will
     toward MS will be dashed as the full impact of the findings
     of fact sinks in to the software/Internet community. I am
     NOT a MS basher, but I have a much better understanding of
     how the other side feels. Gates has brought on this on to
     himself. He should settle at ANY COST--- ANY COST!! I just
     hope that it is not too late.---Bob Brandt

     If I wanted to travel cross-country and the only way for me
     to get from A-to-B was via the XYZ-Train then clearly the
     XYZ Train Company would hold monopoly power. But as long as
     I have one or more alternative modes of transportation
     available to me, then there can be no monopoly...even if
     90% of travelers choose to ride the XYZ-Train. The exact
     same principle applies to Microsoft: as long as consumers
     have viable alternatives such as the Apple OS, BeOS, Unix,
     Linux, etc. then they're not at the mercy of anyone's
     monopoly. Holding a 90% market share is not a valid a test
     for monopolistic power. The only true test is whether or
     not viable alternatives exist...regardless of market
     share....The Judge fell far short in demonstrating the lack
     of existence of viable alternative Operating Systems. This
     is the Fatal Flaw in his argument; the flaw which will
     ultimately result in this case being over-turned.---Dave
     Miller

     If you remember back years ago when they busted up Ma Bell,
     things got real weird with the local phone systems. I have
     to admit that a monopoly can be a good thing if it is
     forced to play "fair". I think that even though Microsoft
     has done some less than stellar things with it's
     competitors, when it is all said and done Windows is really
     a good product.... Now I would pitch a fit if Windows would
     not allow me to use Netscape, but as it stands I can use
     any browser I wish. As with most things you do have a
     choice.... Stop and think about your computing experiences,
     and ask yourself if all of those computer crashes were
     really Windows or perhaps those add on apps or even heaven
     forbid "operator error". ... I hope there will be some
     middle ground to be found here and not end up as a "witch
     hunt".--rgr57

     {W}hen they split up AT & T and made them split into
     smaller independent companies... phone service suffered
     immensely. If the DOJ splits up Microsoft, I fear it will
     also be the same outcome...---Thomas Haas

     I knew you were a MS hugger from the getgo - but trying to
     defend MS... is poor.--Mick

     Too bad you are so bigoted against Microsoft (and AOL).
     Unfortunately I think you (and the judge are wrong). I'm
     one of the large majority who think you people are just
     JEALOUS. I like your letter and will keep reading it but
     skimming by stuff like this. Bob

All the varied pro, con and in-between posts make for fascinating
reading! Come see what's going on, and then join the ongoing
discussion at http://www.winmag.com/columns/explorer/1999/1108.htm .

I also was surprised at a similar range of posts showing up on the
InformationWeek site: I had expected a dominantly anti-Microsoft
sentiment there, but although the respondents are raising somewhat
different issues there than on the WinMag site, the same split is
evident. Check it out at: http://www.informationweek.com/langaletter !

Both discussions make fascinating reading!
       

 --------------( Please Visit This LangaList Sponsor!) ------------

      ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! FREE Quote ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
      Do you have enough life insurance? BestQuote.com can help
     double your coverage without paying more than you now are.
      See for yourself with our FREE INSTANT rate comparison of
       five policies prepared specifically for you. There's no
     obligation for this free service & no salesperson will ever
     contact you. Visit: http://www.bestquote.com/pennmedia4.cgi
<a href="http://www.bestquote.com/pennmedia4.cgi">AOL Users Click Here</a>
    --------------( the above is an advertisement )--------------


"Why Microsoft Won't Settle"

     David & Shirley Thielen, the authors of the bestseller "The
     12 Simple Secrets of Microsoft Management," send along this
     provocative---no, call it "breathtakingly inflammatory"---
     note:
     
     To start, Microsoft's corporate culture virtually assured
     that they would lose the trial.
     
     Let me take you into the being that is Microsoft. First
     off, all computer illiterate people are morons. Most people
     at other companies are morons. Other people do not have the
     brains, the bandwidth, the genius that people at Microsoft
     have. Because, if they did, Microsoft would hire them. In a
     word, Microsoft is utterly arrogant. And deservedly so.

     Bill built the company from 2 people to the most highly
     capitalized company in the world. And he did it in 20 years
     with essentially no outside help....
     
     In addition, an incredibly large percentage of the
     Microsoft workforce, including the senior executives, have
     never worked elsewhere. They were never civilized in the
     standard business environment which would eliminate anyone
     as nakedly aggressive as the people at Microsoft. In a
     sense many, including Bill, are, in a sense, still the
     brilliant spoiled teenagers who know they are right and see
     the world very much in Black & White.
     
     So what does Microsoft want? It's very simple. They want to
     win. Microsoft is not in it for the money. They are in
     business to show everyone else they are the best. To take
     100% of every market they go after. The unofficial but very
     real corporate motto at Microsoft is Total World
     Domination. To take 100% of every market they go after....
     Microsoft has to win. They have never lost a fight that
     mattered. They have never given up until they have won.

     Never. A settlement is losing. And Microsoft is not a
     loser. So they cannot settle. In fact, it makes them
     unwilling to concede on any point. And instead they fight
     to win every argument, even those they can afford to
     lose....
     
     Microsoft, and especially Bill, consider the government and
     the case unacceptable. The closest analogy is that of a
     gifted teenager forced by his mother to respond to a
     neighbor's accusations. Bill knows he is right and he is
     offended that he even has to go through this. And like a
     sulking teenager, he is going to be as uncooperative as
     possible....

     Microsoft is 25,000 of the brightest people on the face of
     this planet. Microsoft is 25,000 people all focused on
     complete success in their project, their industry, their
     company. Microsoft is 25,000 people that have ample proof
     that they are the most successful team in history.

     Microsoft is 25,000 people that know they can enter any
     market, any industry, and take it over.
     
     In short, Microsoft is probably the most arrogant group of
     people on the face of the earth. And while the basis for
     much of that arrogance is legit, the arrogance itself will
     be their undoing. Because the government does not operate
     like the business world does. And in their arrogance
     Microsoft will not lower itself to truly understand how the
     government works.

     Microsoft - so successful that compromise is unspeakable.
     After all, you can't take over the world if you compromise
     with the DoJ.

Wow!
       

Reader Tip On Taming AOL

GP Maloney writes:

     Here is a site I have found very helpful.
     http://members.aol.com/axcel216/  He (?) has *a lot* of
     information about Windows 3.x and 9x. He also has a
     category for "AOL cTweaks + Speed-Ups". He also mentions
     some very interesting freeware to deal with AOL 3/4/5.
     Thanks for having such a helpful newsletter.

Thanks for offering such a helpful tip!
       
  -------------( Please Visit This LangaList Sponsor!) ------------

              13 Great Books --- at a 20% Discount

           Great reading for cold nights: Check out the 13
      computer-related books at http://www.langa.com/books.htm
        They're all personally recommended by Fred Langa, and
          are available at Amazon.Com's deepest discounts!

    --------------( the above is an advertisement )--------------


Just Seven Weeks to Y2K...

Elizabeth Downs asks:

     Mike Elgan of Windows Magazine was interviewed on a
     television program called "Computer Chronicles" about Y2K.
     The program aired in October in NYC, but I don't know when
     it was taped. In the interview, he referred to an article
     by you about finding and fixing Y2K problems on PCs, but I
     don't think that's the exact title. I've spent some time
     browsing both winmag.com and your web site, but don't seem
     to be able to zero in on this highly recommended article.
     Could you help me identify the title or URL for this
     article, so that I can look further? In advance, thanks
     very much for your assistance.

The article is at
http://www.winmag.com/library/1999/0101/fea0061.htm. The free Y2K
tests are still good (and I believe they're still the most complete
free tests available anywhere) but some of the offsite URLs mentioned
in the article have changed. Most notably, the Microsoft Y2K
offerings are now all aggregated at http://www.microsoft.com/y2k/
       

Final (ha!) Note On Registry Backups

Reader "Dino" (who also calls himself "PsychoDaddy" and no, I don't
know why <g>) found an oversight in our discussions of Registry
backups (see http://www.langa.com/newsletters/nov-1-99.htm#backup ):

     Just a small remark: there is a User.Dat for each profile!
     I have 3 User.Dat on my Win98-system

     1 in C:\Windows\
     1 in C:\Windows\Profiles\xxx\
     1 in C:\Windows\Profiles\yyy\

     So if you want to make a complete backup, you have to
     remember those other 2 User.Dat files, too.

Thanks, PsychoD---er, Dino.I only use one profile here on my PC; I
completely forgot that other profiles would have to be backed up
separately!
       

Don't Make Me Beg! 8-)

If you think the LangaList is a worthwhile read, just use the
following link to recommend the LangaList to a friend. Your friend
just may find a new source of useful information; I just may gain a
new subscriber; and you just may win a Palm III organizer for your
trouble (full details also available via this link):

http://www.recommend-it.com/l.z.e?s=143182

Or, win a copy of "Poor Richard's E-Mail Publishing: Creating
Newsletters, Bulletins, Discussion Groups and Other Powerful
Communications Tools." This book has been described as "An excellent,
straightforward manual on email publishing, banner ads, driving
traffic and especially ethics." (Full details also available via this
link):

http://www.langa.com/recommend.htm

Either way, thank you, and good luck!
       


Locked Out Again!

We covered this before, but it was a long time ago:

     Hi Fred-I just wanted to tell you I think your newsletter
     is great. The articles and discussions are very helpful. My
     problem deals with the password into setup. During bootup
     when I press F10, the computer asks me for the password. I
     don't remember ever putting a password in-maybe my
     knowitall son. Anyway, I know there is a place in the
     Registry to remove the value in the string but I don't know
     where it is. Can you help? Thanks  in advance. Rick West

Piece o' cake, Rick: Windows 9x stores passwords in a PWL ("password
list") file. From DOS, rename any <filename>.PWL files in C:\windows
to some other name--- such as <filename>.oldpassword. When you
reboot, Windows won't know *any* passwords, and will let you start
fresh. But if turns out you ever need the old  PWL file, you can
rename the file back to its original name, and you'll be back where
you started.

       
Just For Grins

Dobbie Velosky found this unattributed gem on the web:

                      The Programmer's Prayer:
                                  
                  Our program, which art in memory
                          Hello be thy name
                      Thy operating system come
                        Thy commands be done
                           At the Printer
                       As it is on the screen.
                   Give us this day our daily data
               And forgive us our input/output errors
           As we forgive those whose circuits are faulty.
                    Lead us not into frustration
                  And deliver us from power surges.
                      For this is the algorithm
                      Application and solution
                      Looping forever and ever.
                               Return.
       
  -------------( Please Visit This LangaList Sponsor!) ------------
                        52 Days And Counting
  LangaList Charter Advertiser signup discounts expire in 52 days!
        Lock in deep, deep discounts now and also qualify for
                    special discounts next year!
                                  
               See http://www.langa.com/rate_card.html
    --------------( the above is an advertisement )--------------

See you next issue!
Best,

Fred

([EMAIL PROTECTED])

---
You are currently subscribed to the langalist as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

UNSUBSCRIBE: send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(I.E. create a new email, and copy the address above
into the To: field.)

SUBSCRIBE (it's free!): Send email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Why are you getting this newsletter? There are only two ways to get on the list 
(direct email request or via the WinMag mail list signup page) so if you're getting 
this newsletter, your name came to me through one of those channels.

LIST TROUBLE? HAVE QUESTIONS? NEED HELP? See http://www.langa.com/help.txt

About the advertisers:  Langa Consulting will never knowingly accept advertising for a 
fraudulent product, company or service. However, Langa Consulting makes no implied or 
explicit warranty, recommendation or endorsement of or for the products, companies or 
services mentioned in the ads.

Disclaimer: The tips and other information given in the newsletter are researched and 
are believed to be accurate, but we cannot and do not guarantee that all the 
information here will work on all systems, for all users, all the time. All 
information herein is offered as-is and without warranty of any kind. Neither Langa 
Consulting, nor its employees nor contributors are responsible for any loss, injury, 
or damage, direct or consequential, resulting from application of any information 
presented here.

This newsletter is a free service of Langa Consulting and is Copyright � 1999 Langa 
Consulting. All rights reserved.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Compu-Mania MailingList is provided by PT Centrin Utama
Maintained by   : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Post a msg   : Send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe  : Mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BODY : unsubscribe Compu-Mania
For more information, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "HELP" in the BODY of your mail (without quote).
----------------------------------------------------------------

Kirim email ke