Original Sender : Pace Wamena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------
Hadi Wijaja wrote:
> > AKu gak tahu soal VG, tapi kalao AAP sih pakai codec Fraunhoffer, AC pakai
> > Xing. Kualitas pada bit rate yang sama, Fraunhoffer lebih baik dari pada
> > Xing. Hanya saja kemudahan AC untuk bikin MP3 sangat lebih enak. Sedangkan
> > kalau AAP cenderung untuk studio,
> --------------
> Kalau nggak salah sih AAP cuma bisa ampe 128 bit, sedangkan AC bisa sampai
> 160 bit, bahkan lebih.... Koq bisa sih AAP lebih bagus untuk kualitas
> daripada AC ?
Sekedar Info (Sumber Radium, alamatnya lupa) :
A.Fraunhofer based :
-Audioactive Production Studio Professional v1.54
-Fraunhofer .mp3 Producer Professional v2.1
-Fraunhofer MP3Enc v3.1
B.ISO based :
-Sound Limit v2.5
-SoloH mpeg Encoder v0.07a
-BladeEnc v0.76
C.Xing based :
-Xing MP3 Encoder v1.5
-rJPa MPx Encoder v1.02
Fraunhofer based encoders are recommended for
Internet oriented lower bitrates encoding (128 kbps and less)
ISO based encoders are recommended for professional
oriented higher bitrates encoding (192 kbps and more)
Xing based encoders are usually used in home PC with cheap
speakers by people who do not care for sound quality at all.
Dari semuanya, yg paling cepat memang Xing
----------------------------------------------------------------
Compu-Mania MailingList is provided by PT Centrin Utama
Maintained by : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Post a msg : Send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe : Mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BODY : unsubscribe Compu-Mania
For more information, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "HELP" in the BODY of your mail (without quote).
----------------------------------------------------------------
